We take the security of
cryptography seriously. The following are a set of
policies we have adopted to ensure that security issues are addressed in a
In addition to
cryptography’s code, we’re also concerned with the security
of the infrastructure we run (primarily
ci.cryptography.io). If you discover a security vulnerability in our
infrastructure, we ask you to report it using the same procedure.
What is a security issue?¶
Anytime it’s possible to write code using
cryptography’s public API which
does not provide the guarantees that a reasonable developer would expect it to
based on our documentation.
That’s a bit academic, but basically it means the scope of what we consider a
vulnerability is broad, and we do not require a proof of concept or even a
specific exploit, merely a reasonable threat model under which
could be attacked.
To give a few examples of things we would consider security issues:
- If a recipe, such as Fernet, made it easy for a user to bypass confidentiality or integrity with the public API (e.g. if the API let a user reuse nonces).
- If, under any circumstances, we used a CSPRNG which wasn’t fork-safe.
cryptographyused an API in an underlying C library and failed to handle error conditions safely.
Examples of things we wouldn’t consider security issues:
- Offering ECB mode for symmetric encryption in the Hazmat layer. Though ECB is critically weak, it is documented as being weak in our documentation.
- Using a variable time comparison somewhere, if it’s not possible to articulate any particular program in which this would result in problematic information disclosure.
In general, if you’re unsure, we request that you to default to treating things as security issues and handling them sensitively, the worst thing that can happen is that we’ll ask you to file a public issue.
Reporting a security issue¶
We ask that you do not report security issues to our normal GitHub issue tracker.
If you believe you’ve identified a security issue with
report it to
email@example.com. Messages may be optionally encrypted
with PGP using key fingerprint
F7FC 698F AAE2 D2EF BECD E98E D1B3 ADC0 E023 8CA6 (this public key is
available from most commonly-used key servers).
Once you’ve submitted an issue via email, you should receive an acknowledgment within 48 hours, and depending on the action to be taken, you may receive further follow-up emails.
At any given time, we will provide security support for the master branch as well as the most recent release.
New releases for OpenSSL updates¶
As of versions 0.5, 1.0.1, and 2.0.0,
cryptography statically links OpenSSL
on Windows, macOS, and Linux respectively, to ease installation. Due to this,
cryptography will release a new version whenever OpenSSL has a security or
bug fix release to avoid shipping insecure software.
Like all our other releases, this will be announced on the mailing list and we strongly recommend that you upgrade as soon as possible.
Our process for taking a security issue from private discussion to public disclosure involves multiple steps.
Approximately one week before full public disclosure, we will send advance
notification of the issue to a list of people and organizations, primarily
composed of operating-system vendors and other distributors of
cryptography. This notification will consist of an email message
- A full description of the issue and the affected versions of
- The steps we will be taking to remedy the issue.
- The patches, if any, that will be applied to
- The date on which the
cryptographyteam will apply these patches, issue new releases, and publicly disclose the issue.
Simultaneously, the reporter of the issue will receive notification of the date on which we plan to take the issue public.
On the day of disclosure, we will take the following steps:
- Apply the relevant patches to the
cryptographyrepository. The commit messages for these patches will indicate that they are for security issues, but will not describe the issue in any detail; instead, they will warn of upcoming disclosure.
- Issue the relevant releases.
- Post a notice to the cryptography mailing list that describes the issue in detail, point to the new release and crediting the reporter of the issue.
If a reported issue is believed to be particularly time-sensitive – due to a known exploit in the wild, for example – the time between advance notification and public disclosure may be shortened considerably.
The list of people and organizations who receives advanced notification of
security issues is not and will not be made public. This list generally
consists of high-profile downstream distributors and is entirely at the
discretion of the